Stephen Wordsworth

Ambassador to Serbia

FCO Logo
Monday 21 September, 2009

Sad and Strange

Like other EU Embassies here in Belgrade, the British Embassy had publicly supported the holding of this year’s Gay Pride parade.  In the words of the Swedish EU Presidency, which we put on our website too, “Any discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity must be condemned and rejected as being incompatible with the basic principles and values on which the EU is founded: equal opportunities and human rights.  Every individual is entitled to the rights and freedoms set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, without distinction of any kind. It is the very essence of European values.” 

So, like many others, I was disappointed to hear that the Parade had been cancelled.  Those people who had wanted to demonstrate peacefully had lost.  Those who were prepared to use all means to stop them had won.  In the words of my Swedish colleague, it was a sad and strange day.

But I can’t say that I was surprised.  In the days before the planned parade, there had been widespread talk of violence.  Graffiti on the walls called for ‘death to pederasts’.  The extreme right re-circulated the old lie that homosexuals are a threat to children (in reality, most serious sex crimes involving children are by adult males against girls).  In the days before the Parade, some senior politicians publicly said that they would prefer it not to take place.  The Acting Head of the Orthodox Church spoke of „the parade of shame, parade of Sodoma and Gomorra”, a parade of those “who chose the path of obliviousness and death instead of path of life”. And in conversations with a number of people, I had come across a common view that the parade should not happen, that holding it would be ’undemocratic’, as the majority did not want it – as though democracy gave the majority the right simply to suppress the views of the minority.

Across western Europe, all our societies have been through the difficult process of facing up to, and trying to overcome, long-established prejudices.  Homosexuality seems to many people to be a fundamental challenge to our image of a ’conventional’ family – so somehow it is ’abnormal’, even ’wrong’.  But research into human sexuality has shown that, while we still do not understand everything, our basic sexual orientation – whether we are heterosexual or homosexual – is not a matter of choice, but something we are born with.  So the only real choice, for the gay person, is whether they live their lives openly and honestly, and hope to find happiness with a loving partner; or whether they try to deny their real feelings, and struggle to live a lie.  For such people a Pride Parade is a way of standing up in front of others, and saying, ’This is what I am, accept me’.  It may make other people feel uncomfortable, but that is only a measure of the prejudice that we feel, that we all still have in our societies.  The choice for those who are not gay is whether they are willing, in turn, to accept gay people as equal citizens, or will go on trying to force them to deny their real personalities and live their lives in the shadows.  This time, clearly, Belgrade wasn’t ready.  Maybe next time, it will be.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

Belgrade wasn't ready...? Belgrade wasn't ready for Freedom of Association and Freedom of Expression, both fundamental articles not only in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the European Convention on Human Rights that Serbia signed up to as a member of the Council of Europe in April 2003. Significant numbers of people think that because the majority opposes a parade, that that makes the Parade "un-democratic" so Serbia has some way to go before it is a fully functioning democracy. Is anyone going to address this misapprehension? And until it is a fully functioning democracy and lives up to its international treaty obligation how can it possibly be considered even as a candidate for EU membership? The "cancellation" of Belgrade PRIDE 2009 was a victory for those who threatened violence, threatened death and injury to those who offered no violence who merely wished to peacefully exercise not only their democratic rights, but their belief in a Serbia where all Serbian citizens will be treated with respect and dignity, a Serbia where the authorities will protect law abiding citizens from violence. Such citizens not only stand for the human rights of LGBT people in Serbia but for the rights of all Serbian citizens, including those who oppose them. Sadly Serbian LGBT people had a higher opinion of the democratic instincts of the Serbian Police and authorities than they had of themselves. As for the Orthodox Church: Sodom and Gomorrah may or may not be to do with sex but *if* it is, it is about rape, gang rape and includes Lot being prepared to hand over his own daughters who were *below* marriageable age 14 years old in the prevailing culture to be... gang raped Genesis 19-8. Given recent history in the Balkans and the systematic rape of women and girl children, this might be the very last verse for the Serbian Orthodox Church to choose. The "Church" seems also to be unfamiliar with the words of ... Jesus ... "Judge not lest you be judged." quoted by the Orthodox Church in neighbouring Bulgaria in relation to Sofia PRIDE 2009. Given the threats of violence the Serbian Orthodox Church could usefully have quoted Jesus: "Let he that has no sin, cast the first stone." In the words of Jesus: "Father forgive them for they know not what they do.", the enormous harm they do with their erroneous albeit sincere beliefs, to human beings who as the ambassador rightly says dont "choose" to be lesbian, gay, bisexual or trans but find that they are and want to live openly and honestly "in the hope of finding happiness with a loving partner". Why would anyone "choose" to be LGB or T in an atmosphere of so much hatred & violence? That really would be "perverse". The UDHR and European Convention on Human Rights also guarantees freedom of religion however doubtful or illogical the theology but that right applies to ALL and implies that religion or conscience cannot be imposed, that each individual is free to come to their own conclusions. If Belgrade isn't ready for PRIDE, isn't ready to uphold the rule of law, isn't ready to stand up to those who break the law and who seek to achieve their ends by threatening violence, then neither Belgrade nor Serbia is ready for EU membership, it isn't even ready to apply. It makes its membership of the Council of Europe highly questionable. I am glad the ambassador referred to the difficulties experienced by western countries in arriving at the current attitudes, it creates a much more authentic position.

Posted by Clare Dimyon on September 21, 2009 at 09:45 PM CEST #

I' will add to your blogg just another dimension: I'm shocked with fact that Serbian police's top officials decided not to allow the holding of Gay Pride parade in the centre of Belgrade. Their decision to offer other location to Gay Pride parade organisers means that, from some unknown reasons, they have choosed not to face and confont directly with ultra right wing groups as ''Obraz", "Pokret 1389", "Dveri" and some football clubs supporters.Due to that, these groups leaders now may feel that they're stronger than state, stronger than police. I' will remind yoy that English society as well as police were faced with similar challenge few years ago-threat posed by radical football fans. However, your country's police' top authorities didn't withdraw.They're opposed to clear and present danger and won! I'm confused with Serbian police's authority's reaction also due to fact Serbian police successfully secured recent visit to Belgrade by American vicepresident Joseph Biden. On one side,they could do it.On the other side, they didn't prevent ultra right wing groups to disable holding of Gay Pride parade!?

Posted by Mihajlo Gligoric on September 21, 2009 at 10:15 PM CEST #

Thank you so very much for your support. As a gay man I can say that it really means for us. It seems that we still can't be appreciated as equal as others in Serbia and to be supported and reconized as minority group who need human right as we can be from developed coutries abroad. Thank you!!! I would just like to add something. It wasnt supposed to be just gay parade, but also lesbian, transgender, transsexual, intersexual, queer parade as well. If we identify everyone as gay, we make some discrimination to.

Posted by Marko on September 22, 2009 at 01:34 AM CEST #

Congratulations for speaking out so clearly. I'd just add though that this isn't simply an issue of gay rights. As you say, the response that an event like this evokes reflects the prejudice that resides in our society as a whole - our willingness or lack of willingness to treat other people, in whatever way they differ from us, as our equals. Far be it from us Britons to be complacent after our recent election of MEPs from the British National Party, but that shouldn't stop us from speaking out - human rights set out in the Universal Declaration are indivisible. And that's why again, I'm delighted that the UK is sticking to the principle that Serbia must fulfil its commitments to The Hague. Britain has become a more just and tolerant society as we have come to acknowledge and understand our own colonial past. Hopefully Serbian society will eventually reap the benefits of coming to terms with the "others" inside and next door to its frontiers.

Posted by OwenE2 on September 22, 2009 at 09:57 AM CEST #

As a Serbian gay man I ask British Ambassador not to be sad for me. Yes, Serbian society is in large conservative and homophobic, but it is still our society and we need to work hard and make this society more accepting of GLBTs. Us, not you. The whole Pride thing was ill conceived, sponsored and financed by certain groups in the west and EU. Perhaps, next time it should be organized by and for Serbian LGBTs and in more realistic surroundings. Police did the right thing asking organizers to move the Pride. The last thing gay community, Belgrade and Serbia as a whole needed was a bloodshed on the streets of Belgrade. Once again, please don't support me, I don't need your support as a gay man and as Serbian. Perhaps you should rather support 200,000 displaced people from Kosovo province who 10 years after conflict still can not return to their homes. They need your support much more than I do, but I guess you are neither sad nor concerned about them. Thank you.

Posted by Aleksandar on September 23, 2009 at 10:48 AM CEST #

Aleksandar: I think you misunderstood the Ambassador's point and why this whole affair was described as "sad and strange". It is not about being "sad" for gay people in Serbia. We were well aware that some other LGBT groups and individuals had differing views about the organisation and advisability of such a parade. But the fact remains that there were those who wanted to march peacefully in Belgrade. Whatever the cause, people in Serbia under Serbian law have the right to march peacefully provided they are not breaking the law or inciting others to do so. Belgrade Pride was clearly a legitimate vehicle for people to do this. Even if you didn't agree with the tactics of those LGBT groups organising the Pride, the fundamental point is the need to tolerate those with different views, and those in different groups, to ourselves. The European Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights convey these rights to all people. So, even though no country in the world can claim a perfect record in the fight against prejudice and discrimination, it is right that both domestic and international voices continue to express support and encouragement for individuals and the legitimate authorities in the struggle against extremism and threats. Bill Longhurst Deputy Head of Mission OwenE2 – Recently we opened the Embassy blog at RTV B92 blogging platform. You can find us there under the name UKinSerbia http://blog.b92.net/blog/114976/UKinSerbia/

Posted by Stephen Wordsworth on September 24, 2009 at 11:28 AM CEST #

Congratulations on the excellent launch, Bill - getting the Clash and Rambo Amadeus along to the opening party was a real coup!

Posted by OwenE2 on September 26, 2009 at 09:35 PM CEST #

Brice Taton's death brings Dietrich Bonhoeffer's "First they came for ..." remarks to mind. The showing of the Skorpions video doesn't seem to have had any lasting effect on the will of the authorities to control the forces in Serbian society responsible for so much violence over the past two decades. Would Belgrade be where it is now if the Serbian police and security authorities had made any real effort to resolve the deaths of Drazen Milovanovic and Dragan Jakovljevic? How much have the representatives of the international community done to push Serbia to deal with the rest of the Milosevic era legacy, not just the responsibility to hand over Mladic and Hadzic to the ICTY? How long will Belgrade's support for the murder-denying Milorad Dodik continue to be tolerated? The old bloodstains are still on the carpet, that's why there are new ones.

Posted by OwenE2 on October 01, 2009 at 09:55 AM CEST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

Search

Feeds

Tag cloud

Blogroll

Evaluation

FCO websites

UK Government departments