Simon Shercliff

First Secretary Foreign Security and Policy Washington

FCO Logo
Tuesday 14 October, 2008

A long-term commitment in Afghanistan

Afghanistan is a long-term challenge. Nobody wants to see it return to the forgotten, unsupported, failed state that it became after Communism collapsed in the 1990s. But there is no quick fix for situations with the massive complexity of modern-day Afghanistan.

History, geography, religion, poverty all play a part. We need to be clear that long-term, sustained effort - both military and non-military - will be needed to keep Afghanistan moving forward.

Having served for a short time in Afghanistan, I am convinced that there is a better future for Afghanistan - but it will come at a price, and only after a long struggle. The two or three generations of educated, middle-class Afghans who fled first the Soviet invasion in the late 1970s, and then the civil war and Taliban era of the 1990s, took with them most of the professional expertise in the country. Most of those who are left, now running the country, have spent a lifetime fighting - it is not surprising that they find it hard to efficiently run the Ministries of Education or Health, or cannot easily construct the necessary financial systems to bring money to the villages where it is really needed. 

We and our allies in the international community need to stay there, keeping the violence at bay, and allowing the younger generations to flourish, for Afghanistan to have a chance at something approaching stability. I hope I will have the chance to go back there - firstly to contribute whatever I can to this aim, and secondly to see a beautiful country with a noble and honourable people finally at peace with itself.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

I'd be interested in your thoughts on building a new strategy for Afghanistan. Recent comments by British officials there indicate that the UK is displeased with the direction of the conflict; what must be done to change the tide? From what I understand, there is little to no economic development. Shouldn't that be the focus?

Posted by EricT on October 15, 2008 at 08:36 PM EDT #

So is the idea to stay there until we reach "something approaching stability?" That type of commitment in length, blood and treasure is almost as vague as the intended result you propose. I agree that Afghanistan shouldn't be forgotten, but I think there has to be a much more clear understanding of what we can realistically achieve. After all, the Taliban live there, so they're not going anywhere. Our forces, on the other hand, do not.

Posted by aTitan on October 15, 2008 at 10:51 PM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed