Jim Murphy

Minister for Europe

FCO Logo
Friday 18 January, 2008

Child protection in the EU

Next week we will start debating the Lisbon Treaty in Parliament. Previous EU Treaties recognised animal rights. This is the first to recognise children’s rights. I’m a vegetarian, and in favour of animal welfare but the rights of children are much more important. This Treaty puts that right.

Since the BBC broadcast "Bulgaria's Abandoned Children", in September and November last year, showing distressing images of conditions in the Mogilino Care Home, Bulgaria has pledged to reform its institutional care for children, with help from the EU and member states including the UK. This year, around 5 million euro will be made available from EU funds to help develop alternative care arrangements.

The UK, and the EU, will continue to support the efforts of the Bulgarian government and the NGO community to protect vulnerable children in Bulgaria. On Wednesday, the European Parliament backed an EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child which will include tougher measures to combat paedophilia on the internet and child sex tourism, and enable the prosecution of suppliers of products manufactured with child labour.

Leading UK charities recognise the important role the EU can play on improving the lives of children. As Dame Mary Marsh, chief executive of NSPCC has said, the EU has an important role to play on the objective of ending cruelty to children. The NSPCC, like many other voluntary sector organisations, has recognised that the Lisbon Treaty will have a real impact. It will help improve EU co-operation on measures to tackle child exploitation, for example, through changes in the way decisions are taken at an EU level. It’s exactly those challenges, like child trafficking or online sexual exploitation, that cross borders and can't be effectively tackled by any one country individually.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

Given that the NSPCC is now in receipt of substantial funding from the EU like so many so-called NGOs, I'm afraid it can no longer be considered an impartial or independent commentator on the 'benefits' of the EU's actions.brbrIt's hardly likely to be critical and risk that funding disappearing, is it!brbrAnd I'm far from sure many of its donors will approve of their contributions being used to promote EU political integration by endorsing the treaty in this way.brbrThey, like most, will recognise the obvious reality that co-operation between countries on such issues is perfectly possible without transferring ever more decision-making from elected national Parliaments to barely accountable central EU institutions.brbrWhen will you stop trying to take people for fools with such lame set ups and just deliver the referendum you promised? This is now simply a matter of trust.br

Posted by Stuart Coster on January 18, 2008 at 02:53 PM GMT #

The NSPCC have long insisted on counting a calm and collected smack from a loving and responsible parent as abuse.brbrAn example of their nanny-state hectoring from yesterday:bra rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.nspcc.org.uk/whatwedo/latestnews/retailers_should_act_to_ban_smacking_says_nspcc_18113000_htm_wdn45327.html"http://www.nspcc.org.uk/whatwedo/latestnews/retailers_should_act_to_ban_smacking_says_nspcc_18113000_htm_wdn45327.html/abrbrSo of course the NSPCC wants to enlist the support of the ultimate nanny-state EU.brbrThe galling thing is while addressing a real issue such as Bulgarian childcare we get politically-correct do-gooding as well.brbrAnother such "trojan horse" example is the the European Arrest Warrant:brWhile it covers genuinely international stuff such as terrorism, drugs etc we also get some bonus ones such as:br "unauthorised entry"br "xenophobia"br & "forgery".brbrAnd on addition, "The Council may decide at any time...to add other categories..."

Posted by David Hardcastle on January 18, 2008 at 04:41 PM GMT #

Its amazing how people go on the attack of good charities like the NSPCC just because "they support the European union" or "Receive funding from the EU"brbrAs part of the EU we are able to help improve the lives of children all across Europe rather than just the United Kingdom, frankly im not suprised theyd support such efforts. brbrI can understand why people get angry and annoyed with the European Union, it sure has many problems that need to be solved but i just find it so pathetic how people can be so negative on actual positive issues. brbrImproving childrens lives be it in Britain, Bulgaria or Sudan is all important. We can ensure the money spent goes to help people in Bulgaria far more than we can the children in Sudan with an unfriendly government there.brbrI think you both need to place childrens lives above ur stupid fears about some form of European Superstate thats going to oppress us all.

Posted by Simon on January 19, 2008 at 12:30 AM GMT #

Jim, brMy second ever blog contribution!brAs a basic statistic have you tried counting the number of contributions to the various subjects on your blogs as at 20 Jan. Have you looked at how many subjects have more than 5 five! responses? French health for EU citizens is the subject that requires your urgent action!!brPlease remember that we all still have votes in the UK parliamentary elections, not to mention French Municipal and EU elections!!brBest regards, David. PS My blog of 8 Jan awaits your reply.

Posted by David Watkinson on January 20, 2008 at 09:53 PM GMT #

Mr. Murphy, Why don't you tell everyone the reason your government opposed the original provisions for child protection in the treaty before it was signed? It seems pretty opportunist to come out now and use this as a way of supporting your argument for the treaty...

Posted by Adam on January 22, 2008 at 07:30 PM GMT #

Well Mr Murphy, I'm not sure I agree when you say that you are in "favour of animal welfare but the rights of children are much more important".brbrOur children would be dead if it wasn't for animals who provide food and shelter for them. brbrI find it astonishing that a Minister of the Crown could be so short-sighted as this - there should be more EU time spent protecting animals, not children.

Posted by Will Kennedy on January 23, 2008 at 08:22 AM GMT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

Search

Feeds

Tag cloud

Blogroll

Evaluations

FCO bloggers

FCO partners overseas

FCO websites

UK government websites