David Miliband

Foreign Secretary

FCO Logo
Thursday 04 September, 2008

Political surge in Afghanistan

I am typing this on the Eurostar to Paris for the second round of UK-France discussions about Afghanistan.  The loss of 10 French soldiers outside Kabul on 18 August has brought grief but also determination in France
 
Coverage in Britain of the Kajaki dam turbine delivery has rightly heaped praise on the skill, bravery and success of the operation so far.  But commentators are also right to point out that for the ordinary Afghan it is the operation of the dam that is important, and that is still some time off.  For them, security is uppermost in their minds - and that means above all local policing, a key feature of confidence in any country.  The widespread perception of the need for massive reform of the Afghan police - often rightly contrasted with the Afghan army - is a top priority for European and American partners of the Afghan government.
 
Civilian or at least non-military interventions are at the heart of sustainable progress - hence the emphasis in Anglo-French discussions of the need for a political surge in Afghanistan, led by the Afghan government at national and local levels.  The news that 18 provinces are now poppy free, up from 13 last year, and that drug harvests are down 19%, is one indicator that while indiscriminate terrorist attacks are a rising source of insecurity, normal life including commercial life among farmers encouraged by rising wheat prices can take root.
 
I will be discussing with Bernard Kouchner how civilian-military cooperation can be better developed, not least to engage the local population.  The new and now up and running UK Civil Military Mission in Helmand is a sign of the future.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

Should we rethink our objective of being in Afghanistan. I am still lost as to what are our long term or even short term strategy, aims or goals. Is it about one person, or is it to challenge the way of life Afghans have. Local policing, and ever local governance is a good idea, but that idea can hardly be enforced by guns and bullets. Let us first be very clear what we want in Afghanistan, if it is fight against so called terrorism, don’t you think they have perhaps already changed their base and relocated to other regions, and those who are fighting with British plus Nato forces are just trying to defend their country. 18provinces poppy free, drugs are still running high, and spreading Taliban also banned poppy fields. May be a clear time frame to leave Afghanistan and clear policy vision can win trust of ordinary afghan, We are still far away from moving ordinary Afghans in right direction.

Posted by Syed Zulfiqar ali on September 04, 2008 at 06:27 PM BST #

"non-military interventions are at the heart of sustainable progress". Hmm - so the British are doing what? A full scale military intervention! Smooth move, Ex-lax.

Posted by Paul Everest on September 04, 2008 at 09:33 PM BST #

60 children were among 90 civilians killed in the latest American airstrike in northwest Afghanistan, according to a United Nations investigation. More than 700 civilians have died this year! It’s madness! Indeed, I have the most hideous premonition that the only possible solution to the great Anglo-American conspiracy to democratise Islam — and I’m looking five decades into the future here — is not so much “non-military intervention” as extraordinary rendition, deep interrogation, indefinite detention, targeted killings and all-out warfare between Mecca and Rome.

Posted by Selena Dreamy on September 05, 2008 at 05:59 PM BST #

I thought Afghanistan had a democratically elected government, but from the tone of your blog; ie "political surge", "reform", "security", and so on, it suggests that the European and American "partner"s of the Afghanistan government exercise a almost colonial dominance. When NATO kills more civilians than the Taliban I can see no signs of a equal partnership. When the government wants to bring the Taliban into the political process through dialogue and this radical move is vetoed by the US and UK this is further proof that there is no real partnership. It is time for NATO to leave Afghanistan. The Taliban are gaining recruits because their country is occupied by a military force that is killing hundreds of innocent civilians. Either NATO strategy is stupid, or it is designed to keep the fighting going so as to have the necessary excuse to remain in Afghanistan.

Posted by Stu on September 06, 2008 at 01:51 PM BST #

Take a look Russian reports from Afgan 79-89; thousands of schoolhs has been build, roads, infrastructure, ect... Did you saw anything? When you will go home, they will cancel all you making. We need to wait when they will start to build anything without help from outside...

Posted by Vasily on September 07, 2008 at 08:29 PM BST #

What are we doing there is a question asked by many. What I would point to here is how are we doing there? Is it the best way of dealing with the situation or we have a better alternative. We have to think twice about the safety of our Armed-forces as we are serving in the worse part of the country. The Afghans, especially the Pashtuns, are the people who never give up fighting even if they pay a huge price for it. See their history during the Soviet invasion. They paid heavy prices through out the Soviet invasion but never gave up fighting them. I believe we should change our approach and adopt very safe and careful steps in order to prevent losses of human lives both to our Armed-forces and the Afghan people. Human casualties is only further complicating the situation in Afghanistan and traumatizing the civilians against us. • Could we mange to win the hearths and minds of the people in Helmand or surrounding areas? • Do the civilians support us? • Who do we support? How/who are they? Are they good people? • How to achieve people’s support? • How to convince them? If we have answers to these questions, I am sure that Talibanisation will decrease and a desire for a step by step democracy will develop among the people. Respect

Posted by Bashir Khan Patzun on September 28, 2008 at 04:03 PM BST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed