David Miliband

Foreign Secretary

FCO Logo
Tuesday 28 July, 2009

New Bargain on Foreign Policy

I argued in my Wilberforce Lecture  that "for a new multilateralism we need a new bargain. The US must be prepared to share power and act in collaboration. But China, India, Europe, Brazil and Russia must be prepared to take on more responsibility as global players. This can be the basis of a new rules-based international order."

I will be in Washington on Wednesday following up the argument in Hillary Clinton's speech two weeks ago , when, among other things, she talked about "the need for a different global architecture - one in which states have clear incentives to cooperate and live up to their responsibilities, as well as strong disincentives to sit on the sidelines or sow discord and division."
 
The global society won't be run by global government - in the form of world elected government - but it does need legitimate, representative and effective international institutions that reflect intergovernmental views and share sovereignty where appropriate. We should not fear such institutions; they are the way to address shared risk and grasp shared opportunities.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

If this different global architecture is based on incentives for states to cooperate and live up to their responsibilities, then the systematic institutional evasion of those responsibilities must end. There must be no more absolute immunity for the United Nations and its members and agents. It makes a nonsense of the Genocide Convention's enjoinder that state parties must prevent as well as punish genocide if the failure to fulfil the Security Council's pledge to establish Srebrenica as a "safe area" entails no liability whatsoever, as Dutch civil court findings in the actions brought by the Mothers of Srebrenica, Hasan Nuhanovic and the Mustafic family indicate. This brave new world requires an appropriate structure of international law and practice.

Posted by OwenE2 on July 28, 2009 at 03:34 PM BST #

It's no good looking to Europe for action. It's much too full of complacent politicians doing what's right for themselves.

Posted by Paul E on July 28, 2009 at 05:26 PM BST #

The US decision last week to join the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities shows that Obama and Clinton are moving the country in the right direction, twoards embracing international law. The UK should do all it can to promote this movement. Foreign Secretary, I hope during your visit you will urge Secretary Clinton to review US policy on the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty and the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions. When you signed the latter treaty last December in Oslo you pledged to tell the UK's partners that "the world has changed and we have changed it" and to urge them to join the ban on these weapons. UK civil society is eager to see the results of this work.

Posted by Thomas Nash on July 29, 2009 at 12:06 PM BST #

There are many two-sided same coins can be balanced but can’t eradicate one over other. When reading Douglas Kellner, it is fascinating, he describes; “more interactions globally mean more opportunities but indeed more problems. There are interactions and inclusions but definitely the other side - hostilities and exclusions. There are forces attempting to pull things together but indeed are the forces to tear the regions and world apart.” Maybe, understanding the dialectics is the best way to manage the odds in order to amplify the positive.

Posted by Chamila Liyanage on August 06, 2009 at 04:58 AM BST #

Hillary Clinton at the Council for Foreign Relations15 July 2009: ''democracy is about more than just elections – that it must also protect minority rights and press freedom, develop strong, competent and independent judiciaries, legislatures and executive agencies, and commit for democracy to deliver results ''. This gives great hopes to minorities suffering in some ''democracies''.

Posted by Lisa Todd on August 09, 2009 at 08:17 AM BST #

I like what you say about weak and strong states, namely: We must help nations establish authority where none exists. In strong states, we must ensure one country does not seek to extend their authority over others. I do not understand why you are always having a go at the Russians but not the US who are worse than the Russians when it comes to law and democracy around the world. I was also thinking that Israel and Palestine should benefit from your work in the coming year. On the other hand you have been promising to help the Palestinains for a long time and they do not seem to have benefited from your work. Maybe this year.

Posted by Paul Macdonald on August 17, 2009 at 04:51 PM BST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed