David Miliband

Foreign Secretary

FCO Logo
Thursday 25 June, 2009

European Future

The European election results show that there is a big job for pro Europeans all over Europe to counter apathy or negativism about the European Union.  One way to do that is to put behind us institutional debates.  This was a theme of my speech in the House of Commons last week before the European Council.  But another essential feature is to map out a positive role for the EU in the future.

We need to defend the gains of the past.  For me that means understanding that Europe has a distinctive model of the social market economy and liberal politics.  Social market economy because the market is regulated to serve the public interest.  liberal politics because the foundation of the EU is the respect for civil, political and social rights that came out of the Enlightenment.  But we also need to advance a new set of European responsibilities for the future.  In my speech I pick out two areas in particular.

First energy.  It was a particularly apposite to speak about this in Poland given the dependence of Europe on Russian gas.  The second is foreign policy where Europe needs to speak with a clearer louder voice.  People talk about a "G2 (Group of Two)" world in 2050, meaning the US and China. If there is to be a G3 then Europe needs to be the third leg, not replacing the nation state but speaking up for European interests and values. 

  • Share this with:
Comments:

How do you think the governments of the member states as represented in the European Council and the Council of Ministers could help to "defend the gains of the past"? Isn't it the intransparency of the Council, the individualistic approach of the member states to each and every single issue, and the lack of ambition when it comes to highlighting the concrete impact of European politics back home? Your words might sound great, but it's European action that counts - and for me as a non-UK European citizens you have as much responsibility for that as any other high level national politician!

Posted by Julien on June 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM BST #

It is possible that you haven't learned how to write proper English but you seem to be referring to a speech in the House of Commons in Poland and you talk about "the foundation of the EU" in terms that would baffle Monnet. I fail to understand why you should think that Russia will not be one of the major world powers in 2050 if you recognise that Continental Europe is dependent on supplies of natural gas from Siberia

Posted by John on June 26, 2009 at 12:01 AM BST #

Its all very well talking about a G3 that includes Europe, but that is not a possibility within the current EU. How can the EU represent its members at a global level, when those member countries have very different needs and interests?

Posted by Alex Cook on June 26, 2009 at 01:14 PM BST #

I was appaled by Mr.Miliband opinion that Mr.Tony Blair would be a phantastic president of the European Union exspressed in an interview in the Polish daily "Rzeczpospolita". In my opinion Mr.Blair's candidacy, not speaking of obtaining the appointment, would be a disgrace for Europe.

Posted by Andrzej Sitkowski on June 26, 2009 at 02:45 PM BST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed