Rob Macaire

High Commissioner to Kenya

FCO Logo
Tuesday 16 June, 2009

UK and Kenya- More thoughts on impunity

When I started this blog three months ago, my first post asked people what they thought about the defeat in the Kenyan Parliament of legislation enabling the creation of an independent Special Tribunal to investigate and prosecute crimes committed in the post-election violence.   There was a mixed response, with some people frustrated and others thinking that the defeat of that bill would accelerate the involvement of the International Criminal Court in The Hague.  

Now here we are, with still no movement towards a tribunal, and Kofi Annan last week stressing the urgency of meeting his August deadline.    I must admit I'm surprised that so many MPs I speak to seem relaxed about rejecting the recommendation of the Waki Commission, which is supported by most legal experts, the whole international community, and the ICC itself (they have said a local tribunal should be set up).  It's effectively turning round to the Kenyan people and saying "we know that we've been asked to set up this tribunal in order to seek justice for the victims of the violence, and deter people from doing the same things again.   But actually we'd rather not".    I certainly don't agree with those who have been quoted saying that "Kenyans have forgiven" and it's time to move on - that's not what people tell me when I visit the affected areas.

I know that some people argue that they don't support a local tribunal because they want the ICC to be involved.  But it's not 'either/or'.   Even if the ICC starts investigations into certain crimes, there is an overwhelming case for a credible, independent special tribunal sitting locally, to investigate all the crimes that the ICC won't be able to.   

If the ICC gets involved, we'll support it strongly, as we always do.   But we'll carry on arguing that if the government and parliament between them shouldn't give up on this key part of the National Accord.   Sure, we'll be criticised by some for arguing this way.  But that won't put us off:  preventing a return to out-of-control violence is too important to Kenya, to the region and to the world - the international community has a legitimate stake in these issues.   Just as we won't stop calling for action on other aspects of official impunity, such as prosecution of the perpetrators of Anglo-Leasing and other grand corruption scandals.  Both are faces of the same curse: impunity.  And people in the UK continue to care about these issues: see a recent debate in the upper house of our Parliament

So three months on from when I first asked the question, what do Kenyans think now about this issue?   


ends

ROB MACAIRE

  • Share this with:
Comments:

Dear Rob Thank you for alluding to the cause of the post election mayhem. The riggers are actively shouting on the rooftops about the 'impunity' of the protestors against the rigged elections. But first things first, the Martha Karuas and Uhurus who were 'loitering' around the KICC tally hall,as Minister of Justice no less, during the 'delayed counting' process, and actively giving moral support to the riggers within, should be first in the dock ! So should the Anglo Leasors who also had a major part in invoking the ire of the seething masses. Also the masterminds who trashed the IPPG and ensured a weak ECK team that would not resist their machinations. And of course a Chief Justice that would enable a twilight inaugeration of the naked emperor. Really we are concerned about Zidane's headbutt instead of Materazzi's deliberate provocations about his innocent sister !! Yet another indicator of the steady march towards the Final Day, the causative devils are going scot free, and in power, whilst the aggrieved and the provoked are now the blamed party ?!!

Posted by Iqbal Halani on June 19, 2009 at 03:35 AM EAT #

I am strongly in favor of a local tribunal. Still. I find it totally disempowering if not embarassing for Kenyans and for Kenya's institutions to seek the ICCs intervention. An ICC whose credibility is as well increasingly wanting. Of course ICC would do its best to use Kenya's case in an attempt at rebuilding reputation and trust, hence Moreno-Ocampo's recent claims that he'd finish off with Kenya very quickly! The Waki Commission was an effective one. My sense is that each individual on that commission understood clearly well their responsibility to the victims and to the country, and each upheld that. I do not foresee a different attitude among prospective tribunal members, especially if well selected, regardless of politicians' attempts at subverting such a process. My biggest worry though, and it has been mentioned many times before, is that individual witnesses would require a great deal of protection, if they are to come forward to testify, as would the tribunal members. It also seems to me that we need to fast track efforts at building and strengthening processes of peace and reconciliation at the very lowest level, NOW!, in a bid to deflect or minimize hostilities that may re-emerge when the local tribunal or even the ICC gets started on investigations.

Posted by hadassah on June 20, 2009 at 01:57 PM EAT #

Thanks for your efforts in ensuring our country is on the right path.We support your efforts on this pertinant issue of political impunity and hope perpetrators of 2007 post election will be brought to book.

Posted by Tubman Bosley Walaba on June 22, 2009 at 12:23 PM EAT #

Impunity is a two-way street. And it goes back far into Kenya's past. The present well-intentioned but ultimately bad lawsuit before the Royal Courts of Justice by a few aged former Mau-Mau members reminds us of the past impunity for colonial wrongdoings; and it underlines the quest for "transitional justice". I will write about it, and I would expect either a statement of the High Commissioner, or of the Foreign Office, on this case.

Posted by Alexander Eichener on June 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM EAT #

Your Excellency, Kenya is in a catch 22 situation as relates to facilitating the investigation and prosecution for post 2007 election crimes whether by a local tribunal or the much touted ICC. First and foremost, many who are implicated in the crimes are in, or very near, political power. They will obviously not willingly accede to the process. Secondly, the political class either side of the divide would rather wish away the problem. To them it is a sleeping dragon they'd rather let sleep; why rock the boat when you are having a good time! Thirdly, the rank and file either side of the divide have regrettably subscribe to the disinformation churned out by the political class to serve their selfish interests. Iqbal Halani in his comment of 19th June clearly manifests the problem. He seems to believe that because the Karua's ostensibly stole an election it is justified for the supposed victims to kill or commit arson against their selected neighbors merely because of their ethnicity, or even political affiliation. The ICC or a local tribunal will not seek to investigate electrol fraud, the issue is mass murder, plunder, evictions......

Posted by Mucemi Mwangi on June 27, 2009 at 06:29 PM EAT #

To end impunity in Kenya means starting at the very top. In 2008, BBC reported a meeting at State House where Mungiki were sourced for violent militia activities. Will any local tribunal have the audacity to prosecute the occupant of State House? Most locals know it cannot, hence preference for the ICC. Locals are also aware that State House has tried to lobby the British High Commission to support their plans to set up a 'special division' in Kenya's rotten judiciary under firm control by Kibaki to 'sort out this matter'. Kibaki, Uhuru, Ruto et al., all wish Kenyans turn a blind eye to the post election violence. They have an alliance in parliament to specifically sabotage the formation of the STK.

Posted by Dr Wapili Job on June 30, 2009 at 07:14 PM EAT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

Search

Feeds

Tag cloud

Blogroll

Evaluation