Rob Macaire

High Commissioner to Kenya

FCO Logo
Saturday 28 March, 2009

UK and Kenya-Global economic crisis

As one of the responses to my last blog perceptively noticed, I am back in London this week for the annual gathering of all British Ambassadors and High Commissioners.  A lot of what we have been discussing is about the impact of the global economic crisis on the developing world, including the points raised by others on this blog: remittances, development assistance, migration.   These are difficult issues, and I have been struck by the fact that even among the best commentators and analysts, no-one at the moment is confident enough to predict exactly how the economic downturn will unfold over the course of this year.  But all attention here is on the G20 Summit here next week.  This is a crucial moment in the international response to the crisis.  I won't try to summarise here the way this is shaping up. But let me point out that the British Government, from the Prime Minister down, has been insistent that this summit has to address, among other things, the urgent need for responses to take account of developing nations and of the poor and vulnerable who are being affected by the crisis.

I should comment briefly on the remarks by the person signing themselves as 'Militant'; although I don't suppose that I am likely to change those views, judging by the way they are written.   It doesn't really make sense to argue that countries like mine want to keep the developing world poor - we want countries that are stable, peaceful, more equal and better governed.  Those countries will be better partners for us, as I commented last week: whether on trade and investment or on dealing with serious threats we face in common.  And just to comment on the remark about the suffering people of Darfur - who really cares more for those people: the international community that has been pouring in millions of pounds/dollars/euros in humanitarian assistance, both from governments and from charitable giving, and putting massive political efforts into supporting the peace process?  Or the government in Khartoum, which recently banned international NGOs from operating there, directly increasing the suffering of the people?

Rob

  • Share this with:
Comments:

I see. You wish for politically stable countries in Africa and elsewhere, with tighter environmental standards, their enforcment, better human rights records, tighltly enforced labor laws, less corruption and so on. Very good. What I really dont understand is why this lofty vision, which is not by any means novel or recent, does not seep down to UK-owned businesses, and if it does, does so in a rather restricted way. Is there a disconnect between politics and economics in the UK, that foreign policy says one thing and business interests do another? This divide will likely manifest itself in terrible ways as the global financial crisis starts to crunch in our part of the world--just look at what GTV did recently!

Posted by Hadassah on March 28, 2009 at 02:26 PM EAT #

Your Excellency, it is granted that over the past decade Britain has provided the leading impetus for the developed world to dedicate more resources to the eradication of extreme poverty in Africa. Former PM Blair's novel "Marshall Plan" ought to have been an epoch-making device. However, noble as their aims may be, the tendency to politicization and lacklustre follow-through of these grand designs invariably results in failure to deliver sustainable change in the lives of their intended beneficiaries; only further aggravating despondency in Africa. It is no wonder conspiracy theorists abound and thrive. "Militant" may well represent the sentiments evoked by these debacles.

Posted by Mucemi Mwangi on March 28, 2009 at 04:30 PM EAT #

Nice comments. Dafur is an area of concern but why do we not react in the same way we reacted to Iraq or Afghanistan.

Posted by Paul Macdonald on March 28, 2009 at 07:23 PM EAT #

Thank you sir. This is a popular super-highway that you have made for the majority of the population.The FOUR millionairs may not like walking down this highway but I assure you That the FORTY million beggers in our land will sing with joy and ullulate as they trot down the highway. If the G20 is to impact and see appropriate change of leadership style in Africa,then they should come up with sound leadership schdule/style that must be adhered to by all countries. I say that,MUST BE, by all countries, because an instabillity in any one country always causes ripples all over the world. The biggest challenge/obstacle in developing world is not HIV/AIDS,POVERTY,CIVIL WARS or any of those. It is the type of leadership employed.If the USD used to fight the above mentioned ills would be used develop leadership, the above challenges would sought themselves out. Chacha G.

Posted by Chacha G M on March 29, 2009 at 04:14 PM EAT #

That someone can rubbish what Britain has done for this country in relation to political, social and economic spheres is indeed very sad. As for the G20,let the meeting focus on how the developed countries can teach us how to catch fish rather than dishing out the fish to us! The biggest challenge/problem of Africa is not HIV/AIDS,POVERTY,or CIVIL WARS.Its the LEADERSHIP STYLE.If the millions of USD used in the fight of the above problems is used in developing LEADERSHIP,then the above problems would sought themselves out. Chacha G.

Posted by Chacha G M on March 29, 2009 at 04:31 PM EAT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Calendar

Search

Feeds

Tag cloud

Blogroll

Evaluation