Stephen Hale

Head of Engagement, Digital Diplomacy

FCO Logo
Monday 09 November, 2009

Can I have a new website?

If you work in a digital team in a big organisation you'll be familiar with this scenario:

Someone you haven't met before phones you and says something like:

"I'm working on [insert strategy/product/policy/event]. We'll need a website. How do we get one?"

Your instant reaction might be "No chance. How about using the extensive web presence we've already got?"  but you don't say it quite like that. You say something like: "That's interesting. Tell me what it is you want to achieve?"

How do you turn this scenario into an outcome that satisfies everyone? It's not something we've always got right in the Foreign Office in the past. Here are some ideas:

1. Have a coherent online strategy

You need to do this before you receive the phone call. But if you don't have a positive vision for how you intend to use the web as an organisation, you're not going to be able to convince anyone to follow your advice.

So set it down. And make sure it's ambitious.

If you work in UK government, the Transformational Government website rationalisation programme actually makes it pretty hard to set up new government websites. But you need to offer your excited policy team more constructive reasons to follow your advice than saying "the Cabinet Office won't let you".

In the Foreign Office our digital strategy, policy and guidance is all published on our digital diplomacy website. This includes our vision for digital engagement and outreach into other spaces, as well as explaining how we benefit from a single web domain for all our official sites.

2. Don't say no

It's likely the people that want new websites are exactly the people you want to be working closely with - finding people who have ambitious ideas about how they might use an online presence should be a blessing for any digital team.

And maybe their definition of "website" is actually compatible with your vision of an integrated online presence.

So find out what it is they want to achieve. They might present a compelling case. You might be able to offer them something much better. But you need to work with them - saying no isn't a good way to start.

3. Demonstrate what you can offer

In the Foreign Office our web platform is home to 255 official sites in 40 languages. And we've delivered effective digital campaigns that mainly make use of online spaces that other people run. We've thought very carefully how to present the work of the office online. So we can usually demonstrate what can be done by showing what we've done already.

So for example, we have already thought about how to present foreign policy campaigns and big cross government campaigns, partnerships with NGOs, and policy engagement on subjects that aren't really campaigns, and content about the UK and one other country, and content about multilateral organisations. We have plenty of good precedents, and we have case studies, evaluation reports and a whole bunch of people we've worked closely with in the past to draw on.

4. Share your methods

However good your internal comms, it's likely that a lot of people in your organisation don't really understand what the digital team actually does.

In the Foreign Office we spend a lot of time explaining what we mean by "digital diplomacy". We know that staff don't understand what a digital campaign manager does in the same way that they understand what a press officer does.

So you may need to demonstrate what your team actually offers. For us that means talking through our digital diplomacy method (listen, publish, engage, evaluate), offering to run workshops for policy teams, and demonstrating what we've done for other teams or campaigns.

5. Offer to help them produce a wider digital strategy

Sometimes people think they need a website, but actually just need some help thinking through how they might use the web to meet their objectives. Sometimes a request for a new website might turn into an online marketing strategy, or a blog, or a set of digital partnerships.

As a digital team you should be able to offer them something better than they imagined. By combining their enthusiasm to do something and your expertise you'll be well on the way to doing brilliant work.

You can help them to work through this by developing a comprehensive digital strategy for their project. It doesn't need to be long. We use a set of 5 headings for our digital campaign strategies: Context, Objectives, Audience, Activity, Evaluation. 1 side of A4 is usually enough.

6. Be realistic about resources

The person making the request for a new website might not have considered the resources it takes to maintain it.

And you might find that by sharing all this expertise and good practice, you end up with a long list of tasks to deliver yourself. You might be very happy with this, but if you have other priorities you'll need to decide how you're going to deliver them all.

You don't need to take all the actions yourself. Some campaigns will need full time staff to deliver them - if you want to run an online community then you'll probably need to recruit a full time community manager. If you want to update web content every day, then you probably need to train some new devolved editors. If you're recommending personal digital outreach or blogs then you need to be clear about they time it will take for staff to carry this out.

Digital engagement often comes with no technology cost. We often run big ambitious digital campaigns in the Foreign Office without spending any money on technology. The main resource is usually staff time, and you shouldn't underestimate the amount of time it takes to deliver successful digital campaigns.

7. Set up a new website

If you're done all of this and you conclude that it's the right thing to do, then you should set up a new website. That's exactly what we did for our London Summit campaign, and it's kind of what we're about to do with our cross government Afghanistan content, although both sites make use of existing platforms and are part of wider engagement strategies.

So there you go. A 7 point plan to avoid your heart sinking at the moment that you ought to be delighted by a new opportunity to work on something brilliant. I'd be interested to hear what you do when you take the "new website" call.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

Great post and have you seen how easy it is to create websites using Wordpress?. How about using a garden as an analogy, when talking about site maangement. 'We can all envisage the hanging gardens of Babylon, but without careful tendering, all you get is a wilderness. Build something that you can manage.' And that is why I have astroturf instead of a lawn. Looks green, OK to sit on and is easy to maintain. But does the job.

Posted by Rob Benson on November 09, 2009 at 03:38 PM GMT #

I'm all for this, but would like to offer the following additional thoughts. I agree, one of the biggest challenges being a web manager is meeting and controlling colleagues' expectations about having a new website. All need to comprehend that multiple websites weaken the potential power of the overall organization on the web. Each new website dissipates that power, as the web sees a range of websites, each with a relatively small set of links. If the organisation behaved as a single website as, for example, the BBC, Microsoft and Apple generally do, then all incoming links would converge under a single website address, thus making the organisation more powerful, visible and credible. There must be a clear strategy in place for how such websites will fit together, complement each other. Thus set expectations early on that we the organisation have a website, and each department has a set of webpages on it. Have a domain or domain name strategy, and get it endorsed by the organisation's senior management team. This should define how the organisation should be represented online and indicate under what circumstances a new domain might be created and who sanctions same. Once promulgated through the organisation it is much easier to stop 'undesirable' websites either in their tracks of development or post launch. But central government have a lot to answer for on this subject. I can recall countless occasions when a department would come to me and say 'we've got to have a new website, its a condition of the funding we've got' or some such tale. Invariably the guidance from the government department was that they needed a web presence, a foothold, not a full-blown website. I usually established this by referring back to the originating department and asking for clarification on what they actually meant by 'website', and then I could determine how the request could be accommodated locally to suit the original request, and the council. So, clearer, unambiguous guidance on communications planning related to grant funding to those receiving such funds would help web managers sort the wheat from the chaff, and ultimately help everybody!

Posted by John Fox on November 09, 2009 at 05:44 PM GMT #

8. Have Directgov build it for free on the GSi?

Posted by Alex on November 09, 2009 at 08:37 PM GMT #

Good tips and hope you are able to take on board some other suggestions. How about adding in a crucial element required for all website development - accessibility for disabled people and deaf people? This means that all content, usability and navigation is fully accessible. Full access means all websites are: * compatible with all assisted technologies e.g. screen-readers even government websites get that one wrong * provide easy read options * use of wigits visual aids to enable people with learning disabilities or dyslexia are able to 'read' content * British Sign Language Interpretation BSL for Deaf people as opposed to whole website being in written English * Subtitles on all video content * audio description and BSL options on all video content. * Vsitors need to be able to also navigate using shortcuts or assisted technologies such as speech to text navigation * user testing by disabled people themselves so you know your site is accessible Lastly a good accessibility statement that explains all shortcuts and the site's provision for accessibility also one that isn't several lines long and does not direct you to BBC's 'My Web My Way' that Birmingham City Council a government website does. You need to meet egovernment accessibility guidelines and also your legal requirements under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, 2005. 14 years on I do not see much evidence of government sites being fully accessible for me as a Deaf person or disabled people. 15 of the population that is currently excluded from digital content with only 1 of websites currently fully accessible. The UN declares digital inclusion to be a human rights issue. OxIS report 'The Internet in Britain' 2009 states that "Disability remains 'a key source of digital exclusion". Until this fundamental issue is addressed digital inclusion is a meaningless buzz word that DIGITAL BRITAIN brands about in its failure to include disabled or deaf people. Pesky People is a digital campaign to improve accessibility to the web and fight for disabled people's digital rights. Currently a blog a new website will be uploaded in 2 weeks. Please visit us and work with us. Pesky People website is www.peskypeople.wordpress.com Lastly. Why are you asking mathematical questions in order for the post to be uploaded? That isn't accessible either. Alison

Posted by Pesky People on November 10, 2009 at 08:48 AM GMT #

Thank you for your brilliant recommendations. In modern foreign policy, creating a web site is indeed vital to effectively communicate any government’s position on this or that issue. In particular, separate thematic web sites dealing with a specific global issue, like non-proliferation or human trafficking, run by a public agency are truly helpful to promote a government’s views as widely as possible. However, there is one aspect that I think is critical to ensure that a web site or digital diplomacy as whole by any country, big or small, is truly effective. This is copywriting. It is obvious that the Foreign Office pays much attention to it, with readable, eye-catching and comprehensive content across all web sites that you maintain. And It is arguably what many foreign ministries lack in running their web sites or digital campaigns or even regular diplomatic duties. Bureaucratic or expert language – say on climate change – might well be comprehensive for diplomats or professionals as insiders but not for the public. And promoting a government’s view on that through a web site might be a challenge as it requires much time and thinking to translate your expert views into a normal and readable content that all people would understand. Hence a web site would be effective if its content is non-bureaucratic, sort of lively, with interactive features like voting or have your say, and easy to read. Those features I think could be used more widely by foreign ministries as it is now as a static web site by a foreign ministry would less interest web visitors.

Posted by Alexander on November 10, 2009 at 09:07 AM GMT #

Read your blog post with great interest and agree with many of the excellent points you make. However websites are at times the least of your worries. You could re-publish this blog entry under the title 'Can I have a Facebook site' or even Twitter for that matter. Unlike websites where their is a barrier to entry in terms of the technical side of just going ahead and setting up a website for your campaign, 'social media' has no such barriers. Have an idea for a Twitter presence for your objective then ten minutes later the channel is set up. Instant gratification. Then comes the work, 'social media' in some respects when done properly can take more time to maintain and expand than working on a website. Indeed in social media I would argue that the principals of 'Listen, Publish, Engage and Evaluate are even more relevant to social media than websites and you just Listen, Publish, Engage and evaluate in quicker time. When you think about the word website. The site part seems to me to suggest a fixed place for that rather dull word 'content'. Hopefully in the future someone phones you and says 'I need a web presence to achieve my objectives, how can I go about doing this?

Posted by shane dillon on November 10, 2009 at 01:28 PM GMT #

I get little sense here of a recognition of a departmental site as the authoritative source of information on departmental matters, rather than merely a vehicle for supporting the departments current campaigns. I think we need to develop more of a sense that if our audience do not trust our departmental sites to provide them with the purely factual information they need, they will continue to view wikkipedia, which does show what they need, as the authoritative source. I wonder if the barriers to web site creation you describe are not the same barriers which lead departmental staffs to post information on Wikkipedia, because that is very straightforward, rather than jump through departmental hoops to publish the simple facts. The example that specifically drew my attention was when for working purposes I needed a list of CLCs City Learning Centres. These were and still are tools of DfES and later DCSF policy, the department discharges certain functions with CLCs in a lead role. You do not need me to tell you that the list of CLCs was not on the DCSF web site, but it was on wikkipedia, probably put there by a civil servant who had no other practical way of getting it published. In some ways this is operationally effective, it gets the list well placed in a Google search etc, but a consequence is that it promotes Wikkipedia above the departmental web site in the hierarchy of authority. I know I'm a bit of a purist, but it still feels as if Wikkipedia ought to point to the DCSF web site for the authoritative list.

Posted by Steve Horsfield on November 10, 2009 at 03:33 PM GMT #

Erm....ok. On a lighter note the Wholesome Fish are still playing http://wholesomefish.co.uk/index.html

Posted by JJ on November 23, 2009 at 09:43 PM GMT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed