Stephen Hale

Head of Engagement, Digital Diplomacy

FCO Logo
Wednesday 04 February, 2009

Barcamp, or is that #UKGC09?

I'm ashamed to say that I wasn't at the annual UK government web barcamp on Saturday. But my colleague Shane Dillon was there, representing the Foreign Office. This is Shane's account of the day and the sessions he took part in:

Barcamp or should it be called #UKGC09? Such is the influence of Twitter on this  event that by midday #UKGC09 was appearing on Twitters trending topics.  Will a day come when an event can dispense with an official title and just go with their proposed Twitter hashtag? 

Twitter was the subject of a lively talk which drew together three perspectives on how to use Twitter in a corporate environment. The three Twitties (and not in follower number order) were Communities UK , No 10 and Foreign Office.

The talk raised some interesting topics; one I found interesting was the importance of voice for a Twitter channel. Can a corporate Twitter find a voice?  By devolving your Twitter channel to other teams in your organisation you can generate more varied content to tweet. But do you need an editorial voice that receives content and then tweets this in a unique and consistent voice?

A interesting debate developed around whether a corporate Twitter merely broadcasts to an audience instead of building a relationship.  Of course, building relationships, following, tweeting and retweeting takes a lot more effort than just using Twitter to broadcast messages.

What was refreshing was how we each came to use Twitter, not via some grand strategy but as an experiment. Having done the experiment, where to now? Well I sensed a feeling that government can be more ambitious with their use of Twitter. What is refreshing is that Twitter is no longer a nerdy exotic, but a tool to be considered alongside macro blogs and other engagement tools - an important part of the digital engagement jigsaw.

From micro blogs to macro blogs: Julia from  DFID  gave a great talk about her experience of government blogging, and she kindly allowed me to speak a bit about our FCO blogs. Government blogging is thankfully not a uniform effort. Each blog is distinctive, with its own style and audience. But DFID and FCO did coordinate our blogging efforts last year in support of Blog Action Day. There must be other opportunities to coordinate government blogs around a common cause (and not just in central government - some of the most interesting work on digital engagement is coming our of local government (eg Kent and Coventry )

My favourite talk though was that given by Tim Hood from Yoosk which allows users to post questions to politicians and public figures. These are ranked by users and answers are delivered back on Yoosk. Does this bring politicians closer to the people?  Does it give a sense or deliver real participation? The documentary Us Now reflects well on this issue. While Yoosk allows users to rank questions Help a London Park allows users to vote online to choose which parks get a makeover. Democracy brought closer to the people or decisions made by the wisdom of one particular crowd?

Barcamp 09 was a good meeting point of ideas and great for networking.  The format makes it impossible to do everything but the conversation continues. I don't plan to wait until Barcamp 2010 to continue the conversation.

  • Share this with:
Comments:

So has Shane got the blogging bug...? Someone get that man a blog! Thanks for writing up, Shane. Some stuff here I had missed on the day.

Posted by Neil Williams on February 06, 2009 at 10:34 PM GMT #

Stephen, I linked to you and the FCO blogging phenomenon on my own site today: http://charlescrawford.biz/blog.php?single=786 Isn't this FCO blogging and gawd help us twittering really a waste of time, other than putting a bit of a friendly human face upon the arcane world of diplomacy for a tiny number of readers? I just can't see Ministers or indeed public opinion accepting that diplomats should debate issues and really say what they think in such a public way. What if one of you is sceptical about some of the Climate Change agenda or how HMG deals with the Middle East? A blog entry saying so would lead to a huge row - "if the Foreign Secretary can not even persuade his own senior officials that this is a sensible policy, why should we listen to him?". Hence the earnest but doomed FCO striving to make essentially irrelevant blog-work seem 'relevant'. I have asked the FCO under FOI for my own Intranet blog entries done while I was HMA Warsaw. I tried to use the medium to look gently at some of the philosophical underpinnings of our work, and received some internatl praise from across the network accordingly. But would the FCO let even that sort of work be published to the planet? Methinks not. What ho, Charles

Posted by Charles Crawford on February 08, 2009 at 11:37 AM GMT #

Dear Monitors - thanks for giving extra thought to my contribution - certainly it isn't Spam. And was forced to close here sans checking all the spelling becoming a real blogger who really care but accept fate. I've just got 15 minutes extra at Rugby Library. Also ditto apologies to Stephen Hale, and to any professional ITs; but am analysing the situation politics and economics. Hope for your indulgence!

Posted by Stefan Peter. on February 11, 2009 at 12:35 PM GMT #

Dear Stephen Hale - My hope is, that Blog Monitors permit my lengthy information input to your blog of 30th January below beneath PM. Gordon Brown's video there. Surely the sadness for me is, that so few IR and UKEU bloggers of feedback have been seen active generally to deepen insights about LondonG20Summit. I'm hopeful to work out what various economists have presented. Before then it'll be very much of interest also to study your mega-blogging automation under the Prime Minister's open-ended opinion gathering-in. However, as for economic solutions or ideas being then auto-analysed by complex management software, the difficulties of co-global weightings seem obvious: surely the length of blogs must be permitted to increase; but and that the Laeken Convention effective format has taught me results for an eventual decision-making will need willingness to co-operate, cooperatively-better solutions by hierarchies of decision-makers. Meanwhile bear my simplifications! Yours sincerely, Stefan Peter Mature Citizen, UK-in-EU. P.s.: not too many errors in my 3rd contrib 30.Janu.

Posted by Stefan Peter. on February 11, 2009 at 01:53 PM GMT #

It's great to see that the UK government is switched on sufficiently to have a BarCamp for government. Here in Australia we're about to have our second Canberra BarCamp, but we do not call it a government BarCamp, despite being in a city where nearly half the population works for the Australian Federal government.

Posted by Craig Thomler on March 26, 2009 at 11:29 AM GMT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed